David R.: 91% Proposal Score and an Alternative Funding Route
David R.
My Marie Skłodowska-Curie proposal scored 91%, but it was not funded because of the available budget. I want to reuse the same research direction for another European or national funding route.
The situation
David has already developed a high-scoring Marie Skłodowska-Curie proposal. The main asset is not only the score but the underlying research plan, work packages, impact logic and host relationship. These can be reorganised for resubmission, national or European funding, industry R&D cooperation and publication outputs.
Useful support route
The next step is to organise the existing research assets, timing and career objective into a practical support plan. Depending on the case, this may combine funding strategy, publications, host or employer outreach, industry transition, research entrepreneurship and longer-term career planning.
Questions researchers often ask
What is the purpose of this page?
This page explains a specific part of MSCA Career Acceleration and connects it to practical research, funding and career decisions.
Who is this information most relevant to?
It is relevant to future applicants, researchers with an unfunded proposal, current Marie Skłodowska-Curie fellows and alumni, depending on the topic.
Where can current MSCA call rules be checked?
Current rules should be verified through the European Commission, Funding & Tenders Portal and European Research Executive Agency resources before any time-sensitive decision.